Usually, as she shows, these perspectives are those of women and especially of people of color. I think this quote also underrates the importance of teachers, many of whom are not bound to their textbooks.
FitzGerald likens the physical appearance of new history books to Architectural Digest or Vogue. This is especially true today, as the teaching of history begins to move toward a skills-based approach that emphasizes history as a critical process rather than a collection of facts or a narrative.
And texts make no attempt to link the politics, economics, and culture within a given period or from one era to another. In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: And History is just one damn thing after another" p.
You are not currently authenticated. By not addressing a clear audience she leaves it to be more open-ended and this allows her to have a wider audience. SDI played a central role in U. Some things never change, but the presentation of American history is not one of them.
This is why she says that textbooks increasingly portray the Students are increasingly learning or should be learning the skills to make sense of the past as much as the past is revealed.
As a result of attention to reproductions of folk art, photography, and other primary materials, these contemporary texts also diverge in visual style from their predecessors.
In current textbooks, the word "progress" has become "change," and terms like "fatherland" and "founding fathers" are not to be found.
So the question I would pose to Fitzgerald would be this: Reagan used his sure understanding of American mythology, history and politics to persuade the country that a perfect defense against Soviet nuclear weapons would be possible, even though the technology did not exist and was not remotely feasible.
Yes, like Collin said, Fitzgerald maintains both a personal and objective point of view, but the way that she writes is quite dynamic. She keeps the reader interested and involved with her informal description of historical events throughout the entire writing.
Do people of color, whose history has been underrepresented in our textbooks, take a negative view of the way that history is changing? She seems to greatly exaggerate her point to make it more effective.
The entire essay is about the pessimistic views of history acquired by new generations. Her tone is multifaceted, which just adds to the depth of her stance.
She is able to be both personal and objective, an ability which really improves any writing. Evangelicals now constitute twenty-five percent of the American population, but they are no longer monolithic in their politics.
Her diary speaks poignantly of her devotion to family and friends, the horrors of war, her yearning for her high school sweetheart, and her struggle to prove her loyalty to her country.
This strengthens her argument because she is able to construct a tangible argument for her audience, instead of just using hypothetical examples.
His famous Star Wars speech, in which he promised us such a shield and called upon scientists to produce it, gave rise to the Strategic Defense Initiative. Reagan, Star Wars, and the end of the Cold War by Frances FitzGerald Book 16 editions published between and in English and held by 1, WorldCat member libraries worldwide "Using the Star Wars missile defense program as a magnifying glass on his presidency, Frances FitzGerald gives us a wholly original portrait of Ronald Reagan, the most puzzling president of the last half of the twentieth century.
Still, with the decline of religious faith generally, FitzGerald suggests that evangelical churches must embrace ethnic minorities if they are to survive Way out there in the blue: His idea turned into a multi-billion-dollar research program. By the s, Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, and other southern televangelists had formed the Christian right.II-Rewriting American History.
By Frances FitzGerald. The New Yorker, March 5, P. ONWARD AND UPWARD WITH THE ARTS about American history textbooks. In the late 60s &. In "Rewriting American History" Frances Fitzgerald describes the differences between history books from her childhood and the newer ones from the nineteen-seventies; the examples show how the changes in content and perspective of junior high school history books affect the.
Francis Fitzgerald "Rewriting American History" 2/26/ 31 Comments Frances Fitzgerald (Born in ) is an American journalist and author. She won the Pulitzer Prize for a book she wrote about the Vietnam War.
This is due Tuesday February 28th by midnight. I agree with her that the way history textbooks are written has a major impact. Frances FItzgerald "Reading American History" "Rewriting American History" concerns how history is represented to modern readers.
Based on your own experiences with history textbooks, do you share. [Frances FitzGerlad discusses the rewriting of American history in this generation to include the interests and aspirations of various previously excluded constituencies. On the Today Show with Tom Brokaw] by Frances FitzGerald (Recording).
America Revised [Frances Fitzgerald] on killarney10mile.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. FitzGerald's polemic analysis argues that contemporary texts reflect current social quarrels, frequently distorting history into propaganda5/5(5).Download